The influence of Western secular materialism
Murad E. Murad
On Friday the 15th January 2010, just a day before the United States
of America celebrated their religious freedom day, in Nairobi, that
same freedom was scuttled by the police courtesy of one sheikh Abdullahi
Ibrahim Al-faisal, a native of Jamaica, a South American nation.
What a coincidence!
A demonstration in support of the Jamaican born cleric resulted
in injuries, loss of lives and property worth millions of shillings.
Sheikh Abdulla Al-Faisal was arrested by Kenyan authorities on charges
of being on an international terrorist list. Since these happened
after sheikh Feisal gave sermons in several Kenya mosques, it was
expected for, if not all, a section of the Muslims to demonstrate
their displeasure at such an action. It should not be lost to observers
that Sheikh Faisal had a three months Visa to stay in the country.
Many Muslim leaders cleared off the controversy maybe because they
couldn’t vouch for the actions of Al-faisal. Had the authorities
deported Al-feisal within the 48hours of his arrest which they were
capable of, the disgruntled Muslims would have fewer grounds to
complain.
Instead, the authorities charged with Kenyan security hyped and
publicized the arrest of sheikh Feisal and detained him for days
to show-case Kenya’s so called fight against terrorism. This
was done to appease foreign powers and buy patronage, and was not
in the interest of the nation. As a result, all the international
airlines were alerted and refused to have Sheikh Faisal on board,
ending in a state where Feisal has to be within our borders getting
more sympathizers by the day.
It is such a paradox that the United States which receives a hundred
percent support from the Kenyan government, an ‘ally’
in its so called fight against terrorism could not grant a transit
visa for safe passage of Al- Feisal to Jamaica. It is an unfortunate
subject-master phenomenon common in African nations’ relationship
with western power.
Back to the demonstrations, the police intervention was brutal,
barbaric and uncalled for. For the first time in Kenyan history,
police hurled teargas and water cannon into a mosque, a sacred site
of worship. The use of live bullets against civilians is a shocking
reminder of the post-election violence, an instant every Kenyan
would wish to forget.
What did the police expect when they confined the ten thousand faithful
within the Mosque, in an area less than an acre as they denied them
exit?
The unprecedented way in which a section of the non-Muslim public
were drawn into action, and were seen hurling stones at the faithful
in the mosque, side by side with the police was unfortunate.
Whoever designed it whether within the police force or outside,
had the intention to ignite sectarian violence which should be condemned
and investigated. Kenyans have co-existed since time immemorial
and should be wary of any cartel that is out to breed religious
intolerance.
As I drove near Jamia mosque on that Friday, I noticed what must
have been a gang of hired youths hurling stones at Jamia and surrounding
buildings as members of the public watched in disbelief. For once,
I never failed to appreciate that despite the happening; many Kenyans
were peace-loving and were as shocked and stunned.
The claim by the internal security minister that the bullet which
hit the police officer might have been fired from within the demonstrators
is an attempt to cover-up the atrocities committed by the officers.
It should be made clear at this point, that police were granted
access to the mosque with their gadgets and reported that there
wasn’t any gun neither in the mosque nor within the faithful.
The Minister’s statement that ‘’ the demonstration
was infiltrated by sympathizers of Al-Shabaab who could as well
be here’’ implying to those who were in his office then,
was an insult to the Muslim leaders who on a goodwill note attended
his press briefing. He should apologize on this and the actions
of his officers and stop the grandstanding.
Since it has been normal for commissions of inquiries to be established
for public relations and to have no end-justice, the Minister ought
to be informed that Muslims and Kenyans await concrete action and
not mere pronouncements. The only thing for the minister to do is
to immediately dismiss the officers in charge of Friday’s
operation and anybody who might have been involved in that day’s
chain of command. Anything short of that is a travesty of justice
and will result in the police force being viewed in the partisan
way in which they acted.
Alternatively, the Minister should call it quits as it appears he
is not in control rather than defending police impunity.
Read
other stories |