Depiction of Poverty in William Morris' Concept of Socialism

Published: 2021-09-22 02:45:09
essay essay

Category: Movies

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Poverty and the contributing factors In the journalistic archives of William Morris he states that socialism is ” the increase of wealth by means of the combination and co-operation of the varying powers and capacities of men, and the equitable distribution of the wealth so produced; and as each man’s capacities can be used for the benefit of the community”. In this type of society an individual will not suffer from poverty unless the whole of the society is in poverty. It was believed that every person born into society would fully share of the sum of benefits produced by it. However, the belief of the present day capitalist wage-earner believes that a person’s accomplishments should be standardized and qualified as to its worth to the society. The capitalistic society believes that wealth is never excessive, you strive to get as much as you can or want. The United States has developed into the rich few and the many poor. Poverty exists because it was designed to exist. The concept of mine supersedes the concept of sharing. This is a great philosophy for keeping people motivated, but it is terrible for shared growth and wealth. The exclusively rich and powerful work hard to stay rich and powerful. The exclusive being, a combination of privileged persons united for the purpose of excluding the majority of the population from participation in the wealth. This is accepted logic even though the non privileged are the workers that support the privileged in obtaining more wealth. Poverty in a wealthy capitalistic society is by design and will exist until there is a fundamental change in philosophy to empower all citizens in control of there society.
Poverty is a relative term. In the United States, a person is considered poverty stricken if they reside in a household with income below the U.S. poverty threshold. According to the, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, “The federal poverty level for a family of four in 2003 is $18,850”. Poverty thresholds differ by family size and are updated annually. While this is considered a very low income in the United Sates, the poverty level for a person in China with a family of four is approximately $4,500. And if you are living in a third world or developing country you could have a 75% chance of living below their poverty line. We will be looking at the factors contributing to poverty in a wealthy capitalistic country. Poverty in wealthy capitalistic societies has always existed and poverty will not be eradicated without a change in philosophy from the top.Poverty involves a wide set of deprivations, including and exclusion from society, in addition to lack of material wealth. Poverty is immune to socialite background. It is an accepted belief by many that everyone on welfare is uneducated and came from a poor environment. There are many more factors that can lead a person into poverty. Take Alex for example. Alex was a Doctor that became addicted to drugs and was sued for malpractice. Alex lost his job and license. The closer you are to the top, the harder the fall can be. Alex would not take a job below what he felt he should and over a period of time depression and a feeling of hopelessness spun Alex into poverty. Another example could be Janet. Janet was self employed as a dancer. She worked for twenty years and made good money. After twenty years Janet could not get a job in her profession and needed an entry level position somewhere. She found that the young are the darlings of entry level positions. Employers feel that the young have more energy and can be molded. Janet was below the poverty level without realizing how she got there.
But the highest numbers of people that are living in poverty in America are people who came from a background of poverty. You are a product of your environment. Humans especially at a young age are adaptable. They adapt to the surroundings they are in. There perception of what is right or wrong is obtained from all they see and hear. Most people stay within the percentages of the peers in their neighbor or surroundings. You may be in the top or bottom 10%, but most stay in the middle. So if you grew up in a neighborhood where 80% of your peers graduated from college, with 15% getting PhD are from Ivy League schools, you will be apt to graduate from college. Consequently, if you live an environment riddled with gang violence and drugs, your likelihood of ending up in prison or on poverty is the norm. The playing field is not the same, as the person who grew up with gang violence is setup to fail from the beginning.
It is well known that there is huge disparity in wealth distribution in America. But what is harder to find is how much of a disparity exists. There is very little data documenting the distribution of wealth in America. There is one source, the book Poverty amid Affluence (Fishman), does provide data from 1968. This data suggests that wealth is concentrated in the hands of a small number of families. The wealthiest 1 percent of families owns roughly 39 percent of total net wealth, the top 10% of families owns over 72%, and the bottom 40% of the population owns less than 1%. If you are part of the top 10% what is your motivation for change? Maybe poverty is unavoidable and even the wealthy and powerful can not change the situation. When you look at the statistics, you find that poverty in America is completely unnecessary. According to the Federal Reserve Board, to provide shelter would cost $21 billion, to eliminate starvation and Malnutrition $19 billion, to Eliminate Illiteracy $5 billion, Provide Health Care and AIDS Control $21 billion, Prevent Soil Erosion $24 billion and to stop developing nations debt would cost $30 billion. The total cost would be $120 billion. The current U.S. defense budget is $401 billion and U.S. defense contracts $165 billion. And the statistics given would end poverty not just in the United States, but everywhere in the world.
Since the top 10% has no motivation to end poverty, then why doesn’t the lower 60% of the population demand an end to poverty and homelessness? This would benefit all of them with lower crime rates and better living conditions for all. The top 10% uses control and misdirection to maintain status quo. The powerful, which are generally the super-rich organize and control. They manipulate the mainstream media, workforce, education system, banks, energy supplies and government to large degrees. Misdirection is used to keep people in a constant state of fear from outside forces so that you don’t focus on your situation at home. In America, we always have an outside enemy bent on causing peril. As soon as the cold war was over, the Middle East became a problem. Complacency from the middle class is also a problem. Because we have been cultivated to care about obtaining prosperity for ourselves, we don’t care about prosperity for others. In fact, we don’t want prosperity for others, because it makes a capitalist feel as if they are failing. It is also clear from the data that the gap between the impoverished and others will not be narrowed if the traditional patterns of occupational, social and environmental change are maintained. So poverty will always exist in a capitalistic society, because it is the driving force for prosperity.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read